|
WHO
ARE THE SAN?
WHY
SHOULD WE CARE?
WHAT
IS THE PROBLEM?
IS
THERE A SOLUTION?
HOW
IS SAVE THE SAN INVOLVED?
Who Are the SAN?
In their mythology, God
created all of southern Africa for the San (Bushman).
Then he created the
San, then he created the San's animals for and even from the San. God
left them to guard it all, which they did for eons, until we more 'advanced'
people arrived. These are the world's oldest surviving pragmatic
environmentalists.
|

|
What's His
Future With Out Land?
HE NEEDS YOUR HELP!
|
The San are some of the
last nomadic hunter-gatherers on earth. We have too soon forgotten
that 10,000 years ago, before the start of the Agricultural (or
Neolithic) Revolution, all humans were hunter-gatherers. Then, the
population of our earth was a mere 10 million! The Agriculture
Revolution entailed humans first discovering or being introduced to
the technology of domesticating plants and /or animals. A profound
results was mankind becoming more sedentary vs. nomadic. This led to
the significant increase in our population growth. We reached 250
million by the birth of Christ, 2 billion by 1930, and near 6 billion
today. It is estimated that world population will double to 11 billion
by about 2020! As we post-Agricultural Revolution humans multiplied we
took the land from the nomadic family clans of hunter-gatherers. It
happened again and again; Africa, North and South America, Australia,
in recent centuries, earlier in Europe and Asia.
At the start of the
Agricultural Revolution, the San had all of Africa up to the southern
edge of the Sahara, except for the Pygmies occupying what is now the
Congo (old Belgian Congo, then Zaire), and the Bantu blacks having
only westernmost west Africa (their black cousins the Nilo-Saharans
were then in the eastern Sahara). With the belated arrival of the
Agricultural Revolution technology south of the Sahara, the blacks
expanded East across Africa, and as land demands increased with
population growth, south, along with the Nilo-Saharans.
The majority of the San
were 'ethnically cleansed' for their land in South Africa by the Dutch
who landed in 1652, invading from the south, and by the Zulus and
other blacks migrating from the north. By the time of Custer's last
stand (1876), no later than Wounded Knee (1890), the last of the San
had been exterminated in South Africa, leaving only their haunting
rock paintings, and a few of their genes in the South African 'coloureds'.

The 'last' of the San
survived into the 20th century only in the world's fourth largest
desert, the Kalahari (Botswana, Namibia), despite a bounty on their
heads into the early 1900's. This was simply because it was an
inhospitable thorn-and-thirst land avoided by all others. The San
learned to live there despite there being no surface water. The 70,000
or so Kalahari San that survive today are in Botswana (40,000),
Namibia (30,000), and a few in Angola, Zimbabwe and Zambia. They are
landless (except 2,000 in Namibia's Bushmanland), facing despair and 'death
by dispossession'.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why
Should We Care?
Scientists have
convincingly proved that the cradle of man is Africa.
Africa is where we ALL
came from either in dim prehistory, or more recently. UC Berkeley in
1989 through DNA blood sample 'fingerprinting' indicated that the San
are the oldest survivors on mankind's family tree. Thus whether we are
black, white, red or yellow, the San can be likened to our oldest
living relatives. But out of sight, out of mind in the remote
Kalahari, the last kind gentle San are quietly dying out while the
media et al focus on rain forests, global warming, spotted owls, snail
darters.
|

|
Bare But For An
Ostrich Egg Chip Necklace,
The Kalahari Is His Sand Box, A Tasama Melon His Only Toy. |
The San's demise
equates to the ecological destruction of an important ecosystem, the
fragile Kalahari, where the San and his God-given animals lived
happily since before the dawn of time. Environmentalism is (was) their
very religion and universal occupation. They were not afflicted with
the post-Agricultural Revolution human vices of MATERIALISM and GREED.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What's
the Problem?
Environmentalists
recently pressured their government to eject the San from their only
dedicated land in Botswana, a 32,000 square mile reserve specifically
created for them in 1961 by the British leading up to Botswana's
independence in 1966.
Worse, they have lost
their land outside the reserves to environmentally destructive cattle.
This is encouraged by the World Bank but especially by the European
Community (EC) thru their 'sweetheart' beef contract with Botswana.
Texas sized Botswana is 80% desert unfit for domestic cattle. Yet it
has one of the highest ratios of cattle per capita in the world. The
recently arrived Tswana who now rule the country are historically
cattle herders. Bride prices in Botswana are in head of cattle, not
the local currency. Unfortunately it is a few high government
officials who line their pockets from the beef subsidies.
|

|
Draped Game
Skin Kaross Carries
Gnu Tail Trademark As Clan Gathers 'Veld' Food. |
San Find Life
Sustaning Tasana Melons
Only Far Removed From Destructive Cattle. |

|
But then comes the
final 'nail-to-the-coffin'. To protect the beef they don't need
(Europe exports a surplus of beef) from the possibility of importing
to Europe the wild game's hoof-and-mouth disease, the EC insists on
the installation of hundreds of kilometers of cordon fences that kill
tens of thousands of migrating animals, especially when driven by the
all too frequent Kalahari droughts.
Botswana's wildebeast
(Gnu) population is estimated to have declined from 500,000 to 3,000
in recent years due to the cardon fences. Greenpeace has labeled all
this 'Financing Ecological Destruction'. If there is not a drastic
change, the world faces a dust bowl Kalahari, strewn with the
bleaching bones of the recently introduced cattle, the displaced wild
game that survived there for eons, and the San themselves, mankind's
oldest living legacy.
|

|
The Clans 'Supermarket'
Is The Wide Open Bush. |
Please note that
SAVESAN's thrust is in Botswana where the problem is most acute. The
scope of SAVESAN's 'action' does however include Namibian and all
other San.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is
There a Solution?
Yes!
Botswana is the size of
Texas, but with a population of only 1.3 million compared to Texas
with 18 million.
Botswana is lucky to
have first diamonds then copper-nickel as their first two foreign
exchange producers (making it recently the second richest per capita
country in Africa). Beef comes in third at only an insignificant 4.5 %
of the top three. Tourism is fourth but rising and the real future
with some 17% of Botswana (the country), set aside in reserves. This
includes the Okavanga Delta, the largest inland delta in the world,
teeming with exotic African game. and Chobe where President Clinton
visited for a safari on his early 1998 African trip.
Once having it all, the
San warrant some of their land back, along with self determination.
But their government unfortunately looks down on them as 'pests', and
'stone age embarrassment'. It is suicidally shortsighted to destroy
the Kalahari by introducing cattle in light of Botswana's other export
'assets'.
If SAVESAN were 'king
for a day', we would:
-
Get
the EC and World Bank to stop the misguided and counterproductive
beef subsidies.
-
Pull
the environmentally destructive cattle back out of the desert 80%
of Botswana.
-
Remove
the killer 'cordon fences'.
-
Reintroduce
the 'environmentally friendly' wild game into the Kalahari regions.
-
Harvest
some of the game (redundant males) in a sustained yield operation,
as in now being done by Botswana's neighbors, Namibia, Zimbabwe,
South Africa, and in Kenya, reversing environmental decline and
the extinction of wild game.
-
Let
the Bushman be involved in the remote area 'game ranching'
|

|
Setting A Snare,
Living In Tune With
Nature.
|
But simultaneously
rededicate significant 'useless' Kalahari land to the San, giving them
a viable choice between:
a) staying nomadic, or
b) transition into a
more sedentary 'mixed economy' around well spaced 'family clan' wells
with some planting, game farming, hunting part time, or
c) take those who would
so chose to town and teach then Setswana and English, transition them
into the 'modern world', to act as spokesmen for their own people.
Give the San real
viable choices. Let them decide their own fate.
What will cause this to
happen? The problem becoming exposed; the outcry from
environmentalists, humanitarians, and the general public influencing
drastic change in the current polices inside and outside of the
Kalahari affecting the San and the ecosystem. In a complete turnaround,
the Australian Aborigines reacquired land through the political
process in 1972, after almost two centuries of genocide then neglect.
The Inuit (Eskimos to laymen) were belatedly given 20% of Canada in
1990. It can happen!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How
is Save the Kalahari San Involved?
A visit to the remote
Kalahari in 1998 led to the author-founder of SAVESAN writing
"BUSH FOR THE BUSHMAN", Need "THE GODS MUST BE CRAZY"
People Die?, a sequel to the movie telling the rest of the story of
the San's plight. This was after sixteen years in Africa in a 35 year
engineering-construction career which involved living and working on
every continent but Antarctica.
The book was first
available in August of 1992. By year end 1993, 290 media appearances /events
had occurred to focus attention on the San's dire situation, all
financed privately by the author as the Bushman's 'ghostwriter'. This
included attending the Rio 'Earth Summit' and to a recent first ever
convention in Botswana to focus on the 'Bushman problem'. It included
appearances on CNN's International Hour, Monitor Radio International,
and articles in major newspapers across America (and numerous other
radio and TV slots).
SAVESAN's aim is to get
the world's attention and effect a turn around like 'GORILLAS IN THE
MIST' did for the mountain gorilla in Rwanda, or 'THE SERENGETI SHALL
NOT DIE' did for the creation of that world class Tanzanian Wildlife
Refuge.
SAVESAN is a 'low-overhead-action-orientated'
effort on the SANS's behalf. To Save the San and their Kalahari
habitat is no small order, but where there is a will there is a way.
PLEASE JOIN US IN TRYING TO SAVE MANKIND'S OLDEST LIVING LEGACY ALONG
WITH AN IMPORTANT ECOSYSTEM.
Book sales go 100% to SAVESAN activities. Send your tax
deductible donations to be passed on to finance aid to the beleaguered
San.
|